Uranium Mining Methods in Namibia

Explore the different techniques used to extract uranium in Namibia, from conventional open-pit mining to innovative in-situ recovery methods.

Open-Pit Mining

Open-Pit Mining

Open-pit mining is the primary method used at Namibia's largest uranium mines, Rössing and Husab. This method is employed when uranium ore is located near the surface.

1
Site Preparation

Clear vegetation and remove overburden (soil and rock covering the ore).

2
Drilling & Blasting

Drill holes are made in the rock, filled with explosives, and detonated to break up the ore.

3
Loading & Hauling

Broken ore is loaded onto trucks and transported to the processing plant.

4
Processing

Ore is crushed, ground, and treated with sulfuric acid to extract uranium.

Used at:

  • Rössing Mine - Operating since 1976, one of the world's largest open-pit uranium mines
  • Husab Mine - Namibia's newest and one of the largest uranium mines globally

Advantages:

  • High production rates
  • Lower cost per ton of ore mined
  • Safer than underground mining
  • Better recovery rates

Challenges:

  • Large environmental footprint
  • Significant water usage
  • Generation of waste rock
  • Visual impact on landscape

Heap Leaching

Heap Leaching

Heap leaching is used for lower-grade uranium ores, particularly at calcrete-hosted deposits like Langer Heinrich. The method involves stacking crushed ore into piles and applying a leaching solution.

1
Ore Preparation

Ore is crushed to a specific size to optimize leaching efficiency.

2
Heap Construction

Crushed ore is stacked on an impermeable liner to prevent solution leakage.

3
Leach Solution Application

Alkaline (sodium carbonate/bicarbonate) or acid (sulfuric acid) solution is sprayed over the heap.

4
Solution Collection & Processing

Pregnant solution containing uranium is collected and processed to recover uranium.

Used at:

  • Langer Heinrich Mine - Uses alkaline heap leaching for calcrete-hosted uranium
  • Trekkopje Project - Planned to use heap leaching if developed

Advantages:

  • Lower capital and operating costs
  • Suitable for low-grade ores
  • Smaller environmental footprint than conventional milling
  • Flexible operation

Challenges:

  • Lower recovery rates than conventional milling
  • Potential for groundwater contamination
  • Longer extraction times
  • Weather-dependent in some cases

In-Situ Leaching (ISL)

In-Situ Leaching

In-situ leaching (ISL) is a proposed method for certain sandstone-hosted uranium deposits in Namibia, particularly in the Stampriet Aquifer region. This method recovers uranium without conventional mining.

1
Well Field Installation

Injection and recovery wells are drilled into the ore-bearing aquifer.

2
Leach Solution Injection

Oxygenated groundwater (possibly with added reagents) is injected to dissolve uranium.

3
Solution Recovery

Pregnant solution is pumped to the surface through recovery wells.

4
Processing

Uranium is extracted from the solution using ion exchange or solvent extraction.

Potential Use at:

  • Stampriet Aquifer - Proposed ISL projects in the transboundary aquifer system

Advantages:

  • Minimal surface disturbance
  • Lower capital and operating costs
  • Reduced water consumption compared to conventional mining
  • Lower worker exposure to radiation

Challenges:

  • Potential groundwater contamination risks
  • Limited to specific geological settings
  • Public perception challenges
  • Requires careful monitoring and regulation
Note: ISL mining in the Stampriet Aquifer is controversial due to concerns about impacts on groundwater resources shared with Botswana and South Africa.

Method Comparison

Feature Open-Pit Heap Leach In-Situ Leach
Ore Grade Required Medium to High (>0.03%) Low to Medium (0.01-0.06%) Low to Medium (0.01-0.1%)
Water Consumption High (3M m³/yr at Rössing) Medium (recycling possible) Low (closed loop system)
Environmental Impact High (land disturbance, waste rock) Medium (smaller footprint) Low (minimal surface impact)
Capital Costs Very High Medium Low to Medium
Operating Costs High Medium Low
Recovery Rates 85-95% 60-80% 70-90%
Time to Production 3-5 years 1-3 years 6-18 months
Examples in Namibia Rössing, Husab Langer Heinrich Proposed (Stampriet)